








Posted by
Johanna
at
8:54 AM
18
comments
Labels: Anne Hathaway, celebrity, Chloë Sevigny, Dita von Teese, Heidi Klum, Javier Bardem, Katie Holmes, Rihanna, ScarJo
As an educated and empathetic member of our politically correct society, I'm supposed to think women of all sizes are equally beautiful, women who wear certain items of clothing regardless of their size deserve "you go, girl!" approval and all attempts at au naturel from the neck-up are to be lauded for their refreshing this-is-me realness.
I'm not going near that first one (not today, anyway) and you know well my "earn it first" view on the second, which leaves me to opine on the seemingly ubiquitous-in-DC contagion I like to refer to as the "I think I don't need makeup" face.
Look at Chloë Sevigny above in her fancy green Balenciaga party dress at this year's Costume Institute Gala. Whether you favor or frown upon her frock is immaterial to the argument at hand, what matters is that we all agree this is indeed not a casual event, not a casual style selection and her casual barely-there makeup palette not only looks curiously out of place but in fact distracts from the glamour going on down below.
What a difference some sheer gloss, a thicker coat of mascara, a subtle swipe of under-eye concealer and a touch of peachy cheek stain would've made.
Now let's take a look at the other end of the spectrum.
Though I make a point not to pick on pregnant women, since Christina hasn't officially acknowledged her growing bump, I feel in the clear to use her - here, in all her painted-lady glory - as an example of how too much makeup, especially in a casual tank-top setting, has the same disconcerting, distracting effect as a naked face in tandem with a ball gown.
As much as Chloë and Christina's makeup mismatches bring a frustrated, "Why? Why would you do that?" furrow to my recently threaded brow, what I saw yesterday evening on my way home from work far surpassed either one in the WTF category.
It's a rare occasion when a woman in the NW corridor catches and holds my attention, but last night around 6:15, I found myself going out of my way to remain a few strides behind a beautifully sculpted female, the likes of which I had not seen in-person in many, many months. Tall and athletic with thick, chestnut Pantene-commercial hair, a perfect pop of ass and killer legs, this woman, from behind, was not just head-turning but rather the exact image conjured in my head each time I'm tempted to reach for the Edy's Slow-Churned instead of my running shoes.
Beyond her physique, however, there was even more over which to fawn, namely the just right drape of her light grey heather skirt suit over her hips and shoulders - two geographical locations women in this city hardly ever get right - and her simple, elegant black three-inch round-toed stiletto pumps. Clearly, I thought to myself, this was a woman who takes pride in earning her shape and goes to great pains to wear clothes to flatter the fruits of her WSC labors.
After walking five blocks out of my way and realizing, no thanks to the haunting lyrics and melody of "Wicked Game" that what I was doing might be considered, oh, I don't know, stalking, I decided I would at the next intersection shoot her a quick, I-like-what-you're-sellin' smile, turn left and head home.
But no sooner had Chris Isaak faded into Feist that I reached that next intersection, found myself shoulder-to-shoulder with my girl-crush and immediately felt my heart drop clear to the curb.
It's not that she was a butta face - quite the opposite - but despite her cute nose, sterling eyes and sun-kissed color, this otherwise polished, put-together, professional woman wasn't wearing a single stitch of makeup. And believe me when I say this spare approach was not in her best interest. An oily T-zone, deep, dark circles beneath her eyes, a patch of reddish acne on her chin and and another on her left jawline -- this woman looked like any and all of us do in the morning, but the difference was, she actually stepped out of her home without any attempt to cover up or blend away her very common, very easily minimized skin imperfections.
You'll never hear me chide a woman for the au naturel look on the weekends or after work (or on my friend E, who can truly pull off the just-woke-up look), but Monday through Friday, yeah, I think it's part and parcel of looking professional to even out your skintone and try to look as fresh and presentable as possible. Like I believe an ill-fitting or office-inappropriate ensemble detracts from your delivery in the board room, I also assert that an "I think I don't need makeup" face can be just as egregious - and just as avoidable - an offense.
So just as I advise you to engage in an honest self-evaluation of your body before you slip on that cute halter top ("Do I have the back for this?"), pair of short shorts ("Do I have the legs for this?") or strapless dress ("Do I have the shoulders and rack for this?"), I also encourage you to do the same with the reflection staring back at you in the mirror ("Do I have the kind of skin that doesn't need any help?").
Posted by
Johanna
at
7:17 PM
12
comments
Labels: beauty tips, Chloë Sevigny, DC run-ins, natural beauty
2. Rose McGowan (focus on the dress, not the face)3. Jennifer Lopez (Marchesa)
4. Sandra Bullock (Alberta Ferreti)
5. Iman (Emporio Armani)
2. Elizabeth Banks 3. Giselle Bünchen (YSL)
4. Renee Zellweger (Carolina Herrera)
5. Kirsten Dunst (vintage YSL)
*Jessica Simpson has her own category that goes beyond "worst"
2. Scarlett Johansson (Stella McCartney) 3. Jennifer Garner (Valentino)
4. Chloë Sevigny (Balenciaga)
5. Julianne Moore (YSL)
Posted by
Johanna
at
8:08 AM
10
comments
Labels: Best dresses, Cate Blanchett, Chloë Sevigny, J. Lo, Jessica Simpson, Kirsten Dunst, Lindsay Lohan, Rose McGowan, Sandra Bullock, ScarJo
Though I pray this never happens, I fear the important someone in the fashion world whose job it is to point at trends and say, "yes," "no," and "only on Chloë Sevigny," is going to wake up one morning in the near future and realize she was wrong to have moved the dressy-short-shorts-and-heels look from the slutty pile to the sophisticated pile.
Because I know you're as fully invested in this trend as I am, I thought it was about time I provided for you a selection of dressy short shorts appropriate not so much for the office, dinner with your friend's parents or a Sunday brunch, but definitely for that Georgetown townhouse party where you know your former beau's new girlfriend (or current wife) will be in attendance.
I personally like wearing my short shorts and heels with a half-preppy, half-"awww, how cute" top like this button-up 'Little Nell' blouse with Mandarin collar, low slung side-sash and pouf cap-sleeves ($78 at anthropologie.com). And in terms of venue, I prefer to sashay this look among older crowds that still aren't privy to last spring's fashion memo that declared shorts-n-heels no longer limited to prostitutes and high-school skanks on their way to becoming prostitutes.
Older men feel like they're looking at something naughty, which in DC translates to an entire evening of "I'd love to get together for lunch sometime and pick your brain about, um...you know, China stuff" conversations.
Older women flat-out just want to kick your ass. The thing is, though, if you're bold enough to rock short shorts and they're in their predictable, full-coverage Eileen Fisher henley dress, they probably kinda sorta can't. And even if there was one who could take you out cleanly, it'd still be worth it -- you can't ever really be on top, after all, without agreeing to a title-fight.
And on that note, enjoy my favorite denim-and-khaki-free picks for this spring's best stiletto-ready dressy short shorts:
Top to bottom:
1. To the lighthouse shorts by Elevenses ($68 at anthropologie.com)
2. Pleated short by Adam + Eve ($265 at shopbop.com)
3. Loyola tweed short by Paul & Joe ($282 at shopbop.com)
4. Pleat front shorts by L.A.M.B. ($145 at shopbop.com)*
5. Shiny banded-cuff shorts ($68 at ardenb.com)
6. Silk shortalls by Twelfth Street ($252 at nordstrom.com)*
7. Polka dot shorts by Johnson ($253 at dazsign.com)
8. High waisted button shorts (£20 at topshop.com)
9. Stretch sateen shorts by James Coviello ($375 at saks.com)
10. Phoebe shorts ($19.80 at forever21.com)
11. Hammish shorts by Theory ($130 at scoopnyc.com)
12. Striped shorts by Joe’s Jeans ($152 at pinkmascara.com)
*your editrix's top picks
Posted by
Johanna
at
7:55 AM
7
comments
Labels: Chloë Sevigny, high heels, older men, shorts, style tips
I think the purple tint of the tights is just the lighting against an opaque black pair but irregardless, did I call this or did I call this?
Instead of going bare-legged with a simple black or red almond-toed pump, Chloë had to fuss up this already chance-y, already showpiece-y multi-textured, multi-necklined, pouf-sleeved sateen Proenza Schouler dress with those Wicked Witch of the East buckled bondage booties. The two attention-grabbing items in one ensemble takes this look from fashionable to a Fairuza Balk in The Craft Halloween costume.
An improvement over last time, a big one, but still not up to my standards. Not with a body that hot and a bank account that big.
Posted by
Johanna
at
5:06 PM
1 comments
Labels: celebrity misstep, Chloë Sevigny, Proenza Schouler
I didn't think much of this textured LBD with pouf-sleeves, inlaid plunge v-neck over high scoopneck and empire waist cinch when I first saw it prance down Proenza Schouler's runway this past January, but with the fur collar removed and draped on Chloë Sevigny of all people, it somehow went from eh to incredibly fierce.
I wish I could find a photo of Chloë's full ensemble, and I also wish I had more confidence in her ability to pull off a fantastic heel-to-coiff look, but since I don't on either front, I'm going to have to assume she's wearing some bright purple textured tights and a god awful pair of "high fashion" metal-studded ankle boots.
Posted by
Johanna
at
7:32 AM
2
comments
Labels: celebrity, Chloë Sevigny, LBD, Proenza Schouler
Posted by
Johanna
at
7:40 AM
2
comments
Labels: celebrity misstep, Chloë Sevigny, Luella, movies
Posted by
Johanna
at
8:59 PM
0
comments
Labels: celebrity misstep, Chloë Sevigny, Luella
Posted by
Johanna
at
1:12 PM
1 comments
Labels: Beyoncé, celebrity misstep, Chloë Sevigny, Rachel Bilson, Vanessa Minillo