Showing posts with label dumpable offense. Show all posts
Showing posts with label dumpable offense. Show all posts

27 March 2007

Pass it on, ladies.

Please allow me a brief digression from fashion critique for this public service announcement. Ladies, it is of the utmost importance, so please pay attention.


Two Thursdays ago, while on a first date at the Ritz in Georgetown, a couch-ful of ladies had my waiter deliver to me a note and a second Kir Royale after my companion excused himself from the table to take not his first, not his second but his third non-emergency 10+ minute phone call in the space of an hour.

The first hour, mind you.

The note read, "He doesn't deserve you. Leave now. We speak from experience."

He didn't. I didn't. And they did.

Tonight, while enjoying the 75-degree breeze, the onion loaf and a single cut of black-and-blue filet on the Morton's downtown terrace, R and I had the displeasure of sitting next to a young couple, the male half of which spent the better part of the evening booring into his bluetooth earpiece, save for the three minutes he tried unsuccessfully to get the attention of a guy on the opposite side of ConnAve who he was convinced was a former frat brother at Tulane. After his "NATHAN! Yo, dude, NATHAN! Up here! UP HERE!" episode, it got to the point where we weren't even annoyed when he guffawed about how much "frickin' Chivas Regal" he had left over from last weekend's dinner party, we were just stunned his much more attractive, much more polite (she kept shooting everyone in their vicinity "I'm so sorry" glances) companion was still sitting in her seat, calmly nursing her glass of Cab Sauv and doing her best to look occupied with her text logs.

"I'm going to have to pass the note forward," I thought to myself, "I just have to."

And so on our way out, I gave our waiter the proper instructions and handed him a note neatly cursived with those same 10 words.

Ladies, don't put up with it. Don't let your fellow DC sisters put up with it, either. Pass it on.

22 March 2007

Denim needs to stay below the belt.


I admit, there was a time in my life when I owned a denim button-up. Two, in fact. And they weren't just denim button-ups, they were special edition The Little Mermaid-embroidered denim button-ups -- one with Sebastian the crab and one with my favorite animated character of all-time, Ursula the sea witch.

There are plenty of wardrobe components I don't care for but recognize have a time and place and type of person for whom they will always be an outfit staple. Khakis are a perfect example of this. Tankinis, Tevas, wide-strapped bras, twinsets and five-inch lucite platform shoes also fit this bill.

Denim above the waist, however, does not. Ever. And this goes just as much if not more for men than it does for women. For all you male offenders out there, you have NO IDEA how much snickering - chortling, even - we girls have engaged in after you and your denim-on-denim ensembles have left a room. Apart from strappy man-sandals, bad teeth, and high-waisted pleated pants, denim-on-denim is the worst of the absolute worst. Despite what you may think, we don't think you look rugged-hot and it doesn't conjure up flashbacks of that handsome construction worker from the Diet Coke commercial in the late-'90s, in fact, all it does is make us second-guess whether we want to sleep with you that night.

Or, more likely, it makes us wonder if you'll want to sleep with us after we initiate the very necessary, "I know this is going to sound superficial, but we need to talk about something..." conversation. I've participated in two denim-on-denim interventions in my life, one of which was actually a denim-on-denim-on-denim jeans/shirt/jacket disaster. Like missed pop culture references, a higher probability for dealing with a denim-on-denim situation is one of the drawbacks I've come to accept about dating older men who've spent the majority of their lives in corporate-wear. These men know how to rock a custom Zegna suit, Thomas Pink cutaway, Brioni tie and complementing - not matching, but complementing - Ferragamo pocket square like no 30 year old could. When it comes to dressing casually, however, beware with the 40-55 year old age-group of the all-too-common denim shorts (shudder) and full-out denim explosions. The best way to deal with this non-negotiable offense is to raise the issue as soon as you see it. I act within seconds. You have to nip this shit in the bud and do so forcefully before you find yourself in a situation where there's no backup plan and you're sitting noticeably silent in the passenger seat wondering just how you're going to explain this big blue mess to your friends.

But enough about men and denim shirts. Though I'm clearly impassioned by my experiences with men and denim-on-denim(-on-denim), the inspiration for this post was a woman I saw today at lunch who coincidentally, when I saw her, was admiring a pair of tapered, high-waisted jeans in the Talbot's display on ConnAve/L. I wanted to grab the brassy blonde who couldn't have been older than 35 (though dressed 15 years beyond that), comb out her curling-ironed ringlets, apply a spare swipe of my Dior Addict Ultra-Gloss in shade "313" ($23.50 at sephora.com) to her pale lips, and beg her not to do it, not do even think about it.

I have no idea if she planned to actually buy the Mom jeans, or if she did, whether she would actually wear the two garments in a single outfit, but judging from her I-just-don't-care-about-my-appearance appearance, it wouldn't at all have been outside the realm of possibility.

Her denim shirt, unlike most I see sitting next to me on airplanes and at movie theaters in Bethesda, was fairly well-tailored to her size-six frame. It didn't hang over her bottom or make her look like a sandwich board. In fact, had it been a crisp pale blue cotton oxford, I might be sitting here writing a post lauding her fashion sense. This proves to me even more that the culprit here is the denim, not the style. Unfortunately, I have no real justification for my denim shirt/jumper/jumpsuit/jacket aversion. I suppose part of it is that I find the fabric too rough to be in such close proximity to my lovely ladies; I also find the blanched blue hue to be unflattering to my skin tone. But, really, these reasons can't be enough to place a garment on permanent blacklist for not just myself but for everybody, can they?

Actually, on this one, I'm just going to have to dig my heels into that high-horse of mine and say those reasons, coupled with the inextricable association I have between denim-on-denim and that painfully uncomfortable car ride to my friend's barbecue, are enough. The pictures are just here to act as reinforcements.

28 February 2007

Stop the spread


I saw something this morning I'd never seen before on DC's commuter-packed streets: a MAN in formal business attire wearing bright white sneakers carrying his dress shoes in a Whole Foods bag.

This guy was not on his way to a Teen People party, he wasn't Justin Timberlake, and as far as I could tell, he wasn't that guy who still lives at home by choice and lets his mother set his clothes (and shoes) out each morning.

I gave him as fierce and obvious an up-and-down as I could in my shocked state so he wouldn't only sense but also see how aghast I was at his footwear choice. Then, I looked in his distressed leather satchel, half expecting to find a Third Eye Blind Greatest Hits album and an issue of Practical Male magazine dog-eared at the "How to make a woman not want you" article. As I scanned past his brown-bag lunch and ridiculously large population of highlighters, I stopped, frozen.

And then, honestly, I swallowed vomit.

As I looked to this man's left - in part so I could give my incredulous look a rest - I noticed two women, not together, one in a skirt suit and one in a sheath dress, both of whom were in sneakers bop-bop-bopping along to their iPods completely oblivious to just how quickly and how widely their kind's infection had spread throughout this city.

In that moment, looking at the three of them, I realized that what I previously assumed was a gender impervious to the suit-n-sneakers malady is apparently just as vulnerable. And from what I saw, the end-results have the potential to be even more devastating.

Please do your part and stop the cycle. Please.