03 October 2007

If I had a sugar daddy who had a sugar daddy...

Leather motorcycle jacket by Akris Punto

$2,300 at saks.com

8 comments:

Dave said...

Reason #57 in how I don't understand women. I can understand buying the inexpensive jacket and the more expensive jacket. But $2,300 for a jacket? Do women who actually have some character really want to spend their guy's money this way? I'm sure some do. I just don't get it. The rich are different from me.

Candid Cool said...

Wow!

N said...

Dave,

Sugar daddies don't generally get involved with women for their "character." It's a two-way street, so don't assume that a woman is out there spending her guy's money; men know exactly what they are doing with their money.

Kiki said...

mamacita.

If I had $2,300 lying around, it would be going toward that jacket.

Teek said...

This is a piece of art. I kind of want to lick it, the leather looks so supple. Is that weird? (Yes, I know.)

N said...

Teek, I wonder if there is a store policy that states "you lick it, you buy it."

Teek said...

I did get glared out of Bloomie's once for some heavy petting with a mink coat. I suppose it's just an unspoken rule.

Dave said...

I'm pretty sure that "sugar daddy" is a colorful writing euphamism. The implication is that if she were wealthier, this is what she'd go for. As kiki confirms, $2,300 isn't too much. I don't understand women at all.