Reason #57 in how I don't understand women. I can understand buying the inexpensive jacket and the more expensive jacket. But $2,300 for a jacket? Do women who actually have some character really want to spend their guy's money this way? I'm sure some do. I just don't get it. The rich are different from me.
Sugar daddies don't generally get involved with women for their "character." It's a two-way street, so don't assume that a woman is out there spending her guy's money; men know exactly what they are doing with their money.
I'm pretty sure that "sugar daddy" is a colorful writing euphamism. The implication is that if she were wealthier, this is what she'd go for. As kiki confirms, $2,300 isn't too much. I don't understand women at all.
Each day, with old man candor, I'll offer my brand of style counsel to the professional DC women who believe a serious job is a valid excuse for an ill-fitted, office inappropriate, comfort first work wardrobe. And when the mood strikes me, which is often, I'll also muse about celebrity fashion and my own fashion-related comings and goings, both of which, I'm sure, are of great interest to you.
7 comments:
Reason #57 in how I don't understand women. I can understand buying the inexpensive jacket and the more expensive jacket. But $2,300 for a jacket? Do women who actually have some character really want to spend their guy's money this way? I'm sure some do. I just don't get it. The rich are different from me.
Dave,
Sugar daddies don't generally get involved with women for their "character." It's a two-way street, so don't assume that a woman is out there spending her guy's money; men know exactly what they are doing with their money.
mamacita.
If I had $2,300 lying around, it would be going toward that jacket.
This is a piece of art. I kind of want to lick it, the leather looks so supple. Is that weird? (Yes, I know.)
Teek, I wonder if there is a store policy that states "you lick it, you buy it."
I did get glared out of Bloomie's once for some heavy petting with a mink coat. I suppose it's just an unspoken rule.
I'm pretty sure that "sugar daddy" is a colorful writing euphamism. The implication is that if she were wealthier, this is what she'd go for. As kiki confirms, $2,300 isn't too much. I don't understand women at all.
Post a Comment